paper-context-resolver
The paper-context-resolver skill provides targeted information from research papers to resolve specific gaps in deep learning repository reproduction. It focuses on technical details like dataset splits, preprocessing steps, evaluation protocols, checkpoint mappings, and runtime assumptions.
Is paper-context-resolver safe to install?
Safe to install: our audit of paper-context-resolver's source files found 0 shell commands, 0 external URLs, file reads and writes (low risk). Every command and URL listed appears verbatim in the skill's source. The skill reads local files including references/paper-assisted-reproduction.md and repository metadata to provide context.
How we audit skills: our security review methodology.
Who is this skill for?
Developers and researchers performing deep learning repository reproduction who encounter specific technical ambiguities in documentation.
What can you do with it?
- Resolving dataset version or split discrepancies
- Clarifying preprocessing requirements
- Identifying evaluation protocol details
- Mapping checkpoints to specific paper configurations
- Documenting conflicts between README instructions and paper evidence
How good is this skill?
Quality score: 9/10. The skill documentation is clear regarding its narrow scope and specific use cases. It provides explicit boundaries to prevent misuse.
What does the skill file contain?
# paper-context-resolver Use this as the Rigor Paper Context helper. The installed slug remains `paper-context-resolver` for compatibility. ## When to apply - README and repo files leave a reproduction-critical gap. - The gap concerns dataset version, split, preprocessing, evaluation protocol, checkpoint mapping, or runtime assumptions. - The main skill needs a narrow evidence supplement instead of a full paper summary. - There is already a concrete reproduction question to answer. ## When not to apply - The README already gives enough reproduction detail. - The user wants a general paper...
Frequently asked questions
Does this skill summarize entire research papers?
No. The skill provides narrow evidence supplements for specific reproduction gaps rather than general paper summaries.
When should I use this skill?
Use this skill when the repository README leaves a critical gap regarding dataset, preprocessing, evaluation, or runtime assumptions.
Does this skill replace README instructions?
No. It supplements README-first reproduction and requires the user to document any conflicts between the paper and the README.
Related skills
github-actions-docs
264.6KDevelopers and DevOps engineers working with GitHub Actions workflows
The github-actions-docs skill provides grounded answers to GitHub Actions queries by retrieving information from official GitHub documentation. It assists with workflow syntax, security, migration, and runner configuration.
brainstorming
256.4KDevelopers and project managers who need to define requirements, architecture, and design for software projects before writing code
A structured brainstorming framework that guides users through project exploration, design proposal, and specification before implementation. It enforces a strict design-first workflow, requiring user approval for designs and documentation before transitioning to the writing-plans skill.
analyze-project
91.3KResearchers and developers who need to understand the architecture and implementation details of a deep learning repository before modifying code
The analyze-project skill performs read-only audits of deep learning repositories. It maps model structures, identifies training and inference entrypoints, reviews configuration relationships, and flags suspicious implementation patterns.
customer-research
46.7KProduct marketers, founders, and researchers who need to ground their strategy in customer data
The customer-research skill provides a framework for analyzing existing research assets and gathering new insights from online communities to inform product marketing, messaging, and persona development.