paper-revision
The paper-revision skill provides a structured workflow to address reviewer feedback in academic papers. It parses comments, maps them to paper sections, plans revisions, executes edits, and verifies improvements.
Is paper-revision safe to install?
Review before installing: our audit of paper-revision's source files found 0 shell commands, 0 external URLs, file reads and writes (medium risk). Every command and URL listed appears verbatim in the skill's source. The skill reads and modifies local paper files and requires access to experiment and figure generation skills.
How we audit skills: our security review methodology.
Who is this skill for?
Academic researchers and authors preparing revisions for peer-reviewed papers.
What can you do with it?
- Mapping reviewer concerns to specific paper sections
- Planning structural changes and text clarifications
- Integrating new experimental results or analyses
- Marking revised text for reviewer visibility
- Generating a summary of changes for a response letter
How good is this skill?
Quality score: 4/10. The skill provides a clear, logical workflow for academic revision. It lacks specific API or shell command dependencies, relying instead on integration with other modular skills.
What does the skill file contain?
# Paper Revision Systematically revise papers based on reviewer feedback. ## Input - `$0` — Reviewer comments/feedback - `$1` — Current paper draft (main.tex or paper directory) ## References - Revision workflow and prompts: `~/.claude/skills/paper-revision/references/revision-prompts.md` ## Workflow ### Step 1: Parse and Prioritize Concerns For each reviewer comment: 1. Extract the specific concern 2. Classify: major revision, minor revision, question, suggestion 3. Map to affected paper section(s) 4. Prioritize: address major concerns first ### Step 2: Plan Revisions Create a revisio...
Frequently asked questions
How does the skill handle new experiments?
The skill delegates experiment execution to the experiment-code skill.
How are revisions highlighted for reviewers?
The skill applies the LaTeX command \textcolor{blue}{...} to revised text.
Does the skill verify if revisions improve the paper?
Yes, it uses the self-review skill to compare scores before and after revisions.
Related skills
customer-research
46.7KProduct marketers, founders, and researchers who need to ground their strategy in customer data
The customer-research skill provides a framework for analyzing existing research assets and gathering new insights from online communities to inform product marketing, messaging, and persona development.
persona-researcher
17.1KResearchers and project teams using Google Workspace for data management and documentation
The persona-researcher skill organizes research materials, manages references, and facilitates collaboration across Google Workspace applications.
firecrawl-lead-research
12.7KSales professionals, partnership managers, investors, and interviewers preparing for meetings
The firecrawl-lead-research skill generates pre-meeting intelligence briefs by scraping company websites, news, and public profiles using the Firecrawl API.
brief
6.3KContent marketers, SEO specialists, and writers preparing content for search engine ranking
The brief skill provides a structured framework for creating editor-ready content briefs. It guides users through SERP analysis, intent mapping, outline generation, E-E-A-T requirement setting, and SEO target definition.